The Wellesley School Committee (SC) met remotely on August 25th to discuss the future of in-person education in Wellesley.
One take-away — getting kids and teachers back into school buildings will depend largely on the successful implementation of a coronavirus testing program, which will be financed in part by state funding, and in part by local funding. (See Wellesley Education Foundation seeks to raise up to $3.5 million for COVID testing program.)
As for when students will this year begin their education, the State of Massachusetts says that all learning for students statewide must begin no later than September 16. For Wellesley students, school will begin on that date, however, all students will start school remotely.
Initially, the district had planned to start school with a hybrid model that included in-person education starting on Sept. 16. Now, however, students will not report to school buildings until October 1 – 2, when the transition to in-person hybrid schooling will begin.
Wellesley gets a new school
A key component in determining how schools would open in the fall was the results of the Families and Educators surveys, which which were sent out online in July. Those survey results reflected a preference in the community for a hybrid schooling model. Lussier noted, “We’re looking at just over 500 students whose parents have opted them into the remote learning model.” That number reflects roughly 10% of the student population, and to serve them, the town is essentially launching a brand-new school.
The district is in the process of hiring a principal and staff to serve the students attending this new remote-learning school.
“We’re essentially going to have a school of about 500 students who are there stem-to-stern — elementary, middle, and high school — so we do need a single individual who can help provide management and support of that whole program,” Lussier said.
Will there be enough staff?
Whether there will be the necessary staff to teach in-person is right now an unknown. Many school staff members, 95% of whom live outside of Wellesley, may have medical issues of their own or within their families that could preclude them from returning. Also, many staff members have child care issues. With each district developing its own return plans which vary greatly across the Metrowest area, the children of staff may potentially have a very different school schedule than their parents who work in Wellesley.
Then there’s the safety issue, something that has been at the forefront of negotiations between the Wellesley Educators Association (WEA) and the district as they’ve worked toward reaching an agreement on reopening plans. In a letter to the school community, Lussier said, “Our educators have raised a number of serious concerns about the safety of returning to an in-person education and the degree to which our health and safety protocols will mitigate their level of risk, which has been the most significant issue in our negotiations with the WEA.”
“We are concerned that unless we continue to address some of the safety issues, we may not have the staff,” Lussier said during the School Committee meeting.
To address these concerns, the district has gone beyond the baseline safety protocols of planned implementation of social distancing, hand washing, and mask-wearing. Because indoor air quality is a hot-button issue right now, the schools have been working with the Wellesley Facilities Management Department (FMD) to improve air filtration in the buildings. They plan to achieve that through installing MERV 13 air filters in the schools’ HVAC systems. These filters reportedly filter out small particles and debris before they are released into the air.
Production and distribution is proving to be a challenge, however. The delivery time for the filters, which are made out of the same high-demand material used to make masks, is estimated to be from a few weeks away to as long as 10 weeks. The FMD currently is installing the filters as they have been able to obtain them.
The great outdoors
The district plans to leverage Wellesley schools’ outdoor spaces as much as possible and has found 4-season tents which can take on the winter’s snow load. “These are things we can actually use year-round,” Lussier said.
The rental tents will not mimic an indoor space. They won’t have flaps that can be drawn down, nor will they be heated. Their purpose is to reduce time indoors.
Testing 1,2,3
The district sees coronavirus testing as essential to opening schools and to keeping them and to keeping them open. To that end, the plan is for a testing program that has three strands:
- A baseline testing of all students and staff
- Immediate testing of all students and staff who present with COVID symptoms
- Ongoing, proactive surveillance testing
The plan is for all staff to be tested once per week, and either the full population of students or potentially a smaller group, perhaps 1/3 of all students, to be tested each week. “This will allow us to capture any outbreaks of students who might be carriers with no symptoms, so we can move swiftly to quarantine those students,” Lussier said.
Because asymptomatic testing is not covered by insurance plans, the Wellesley Education Foundation has been fundraising for the effort. In addition, Cindy Mahr, Assistant Superintendent for Finance and Operations, reported that WPS has received three grants from the state:
- $100k grant to be used toward technology
- $123k grant from the COVID relief fund
- $1 million grant, also COVID-related (to go toward items such as tents; PPE; study costs on ventilation and air circulation)
Air filters, tents, and testing is what passes for good news these days
After explaining plans to order and install air filters, erect tents, and fundraise for COVID tests, you just knew that another shoe had to drop, and it did. Lussier broke the news that school reopening would not go forward with the same trajectory put forth in the original Wellesley Public Schools reopening plan.
Whereas back in July the plan was for in-person instruction of students to begin on September 16, now the plan is for the first in-person day to be two weeks later, on October 1st and 2nd.
Instruction will still begin on September 16, however, that work will begin in a fully remote model.
We’ve heard from a few parents who are feeling frustrated. One parent via Facebook message encapsulated the mood saying, “I don’t understand who is to blame for our kids not going back, when every private school will. How does the union have so much power?”
We’ve heard from other families who have decided to opt out of the public schools entirely for now. They’re searching for a teacher to homeschool their own kids and a couple more from families they know and trust in a pod-model of education. These families are not kidding around and are offering full-time pay, benefits, sick time, and vacation time.
Still, the donors who are pledging big bucks to the Wellesley Education Foundation (WEF) may be the silent cheerleaders in support of the public schools. Over 500 families out of a parent community of nearly 3,000 families submitted responses to a WEF-initiated survey designed to gauge interest in funding an ongoing COVID testing program. Respondents indicated a willingness to contribute to the program in excess of $750,000.
WEF has gotten things going by donating $250,000, just to show where they stand in the realm of civic responsibility and leadership.
As the school year creeps closer ever-so-slowly, one thing seems clear. Don’t be surprised if things change again during this time of pandemic.
- Subscribe to Swellesley’s daily email
- Please consider contributing to Swellesley to sustain our independent journalism venture
Thanks Deborah for this helpful summary on an important topic.
I noticed it says 500/10% students in Wellesley have opted to join the town’s new remote school. Are you able to determine how many students have opted not to attend WPS in any capacity, whether by deferring (kindergarten) or withdrawing (e.g., private school, homeschool, pod school, etc.)?
Just trying to get a sense of the numbers. Thanks.
We don’t have those numbers yet, but yes, those are the posts we need to do next.
I believe many parents will be pulling their kids out of WPS for alternatives, because remote learning just doesn’t work for young kids. Especially given this latest “delay.” We all see the writing on the wall. We are not getting back into the school buildings this fall, or maybe this year. If the union isn’t willing to let the teachers go back now, when rates are so low and have been steadily low for months, and the weather is warm and some part of the school day can be outside, they are NEVER going to agree to go back until there’s a vaccine and it’s widely distributed. This isn’t the teachers’ fault but a lot of us have lost all faith in the public school system.
In my daughter’s friend group 3 of the 7 have opted for a private school. I have sent information to at least a dozen parents about options for homeschooling for a bridge year. A decent percentage of the parents who choose hybrid will be pulling their children – if hybrid does not work out well.
The school reopening plan is a colossal, disappointing failure. The best interests of school children have been cast aside. I blame the teacher union primarily – the union talking points were pushed down by the state level union with most local unions then adopting them part and parcel. I am also disappointed in the School Committee. Although I’m appreciative of the countless hours and efforts they spend on behalf of our school community, in regard to the critical issue of getting children back into the classroom, they collectively seem unwilling or incapable of representing the interests of Wellesley school children and their parents. I watched the school committee meeting this past Tuesday night, after the Superintendent dropped the news that school would not start in person on September 16, not one member of the school committee asked any question or advocated for alternatives in order to keep our kids on track to start in person learning in September.
Apparently 90% of parents want children to return to school via the hybrid plan, yet political considerations, fear and irrational thinking have trumped recommendations by our public health experts and physicians. Oct 1 is now the goal to start in person hybrid learning but the goal posts keep moving every few weeks. School was originally set to begin September 2, then September 16, now the “plan” is to start on October 1. For good reason, many parents are becoming increasingly skeptical about that date as well.
I am furious about the current situation and sick with worry for our elementary school children who cannot learn remotely. The Wellesley Educators Association is mostly to blame – Kyle Gekopi announced the union’s stance on remote learning one day after the Reopening Plan (proposing a hybrid model) was announced in late July. But Kyle was on the Reopening Advisory Board and intimately involved in the planning from the very beginning! The plan was put together based on lots of feedback from both teachers and parents. It was flawed in that it did not prioritize the youngest kids to go back full time but at least it was a compromise. Then, in late July, the WEA decided to fall into lockstep with the Massachusetts Teachers Association in pushing for all remote, after so much planning and hundreds of hours of work went into the Reopening Plan all summer. Why didn’t Mr. Gekopi speak up sooner! At least there would have been time to plan a more robust remote program if we knew the union’s stance earlier. The union has now become entrenched despite the fact that Wellesley’s infection rate is 1.4 per 100,000 and the positivity test rate is 0.4%, and reputable scientists and doctors and the Board of Health all believe we can go back in person safely. But the union does not want to get to a place of “yes” where they have to agree to go back, because some of their demands are not realistic. I don’t believe the WEA even represents what most teachers want, as many teachers have children of their own and want them back to school. Honestly, teachers with kids are in a tough bind because they may be on completely different schedules than their kids. I support the WPS teachers now more than ever. We want to keep them safe and healthy, and the parents would happily donate money to buy adequate PPE for them, and plexiglass and air purifiers for the classrooms. It is disgraceful that the unions statewide are elevating fear and power over science and data. All at the expense of our vulnerable children, the youngest ones who are being completely robbed of any chance of an education this year. If the union cared about the children at all, they would try to get at least K-2 back in person. They don’t. They are going to seriously damage the public education system in Wellesley. Not to mention the inequity of it all, as full time remote will greatly exacerbate the achievement gap along racial and socioeconomic lines and is heartbreaking. And our economy, specifically the strides women have made in the workforce over decades, will be damaged for years to come because parents (usually moms) are forced to quit their jobs to supervise remote learning. These harms heavily outweigh the minimal risks of going back in person with proper precautions given Wellesley’s low rates. Shame on you, WEA.