• Contact Us
  • Events calendar
Entering Swellesley
Pinnacle, Wellesley

The Swellesley Report

More than you really want to know about Wellesley, Mass.

  • Advertise
  • Business index
  • Contribute
  • Wellesley Square
  • Private schools
  • Camp
  • Eat
  • Schools
  • Top 10 things to do
  • Embracing diversity
  • Kids
  • About us
  • Events
  • Natick Report
  • COVID-19
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Athlete of the Week
  • Seniors
Needham Bank, Wellesley
Write Ahead, Wellesley

Wellesley fashion statement: Fur sale ban proposed

January 23, 2020 by Bob Brown 5 Comments

A citizen petition to ban fur sales in Wellesley is on the Board of Selectmen meeting agenda for Monday night with the goal of having Town Meeting weigh in this Spring on a proposed bylaw.

The petition is spearheaded by Wellesley resident, Wellesley College Professor and Humane Society of the United States volunteer Liza Oliver. More details are available on the Fur-Free Wellesley site, but I also caught up with Oliver by email and her responses to my questions are below, along with the proposed bylaw.

Furs can be seen at certain Wellesley stores, and you can’t throw a snowball in town without hitting someone wearing a Canada Goose parka lined with coyote fur (not that the coats were sold here). And a fur fact: Wellesley Furs, out of New York, apparently used to be quite a thing in the early 20th century.

The citizen petition cites the suffering by animals whose fur is used for clothing at a time when there is a “wide array of alternatives for fashion and apparel.” It argues that a ban on fur sales in town “will foster a more humane environment in Wellesley.” The bylaw does address exceptions, such as furs used for religious purposes.

There’s a move afoot across the world, including in the United States, to ban fur sales. California leads the way in the States, with a fur sales ban going into effect in 2023. While Massachusetts hasn’t followed suit, the state has taken at least one related step in forbidding hunting contests that target fur bearers.

Here’s my exchange with Fur-Free Wellesley’s Liza Oliver:

Have you actually seen much in the way of fur products being sold in town? 

Most retailers in Wellesley that sell textiles of any variety do not sell fur, and for the few who do, it generally comes in the form of pom poms on hats, or lining on coat hoods or shoes.  The stores that do have a small number of fur accessories also already sell faux fur as well, in which equivalent alternatives of real fur styles exist.  Based on the fairly thorough though not exhaustive survey of in-store and online inventories I did back in early December when fur inventories were at their highest, fur represents a negligible amount of inventory in Wellesley. No one’s livelihood would be affected should this bylaw be implemented.

Have you spoken to any retailers in town about their fur sales, and have you had any indication from them if it’s something they will fight to defend or if they might be moving in this direction anyway?

I have been in touch with a representative from the Wellesley Square Merchants’ Association, and they provided me with the following statement: “The policy of the Wellesley Square Merchants’ Association, and the expectation of its members, is to be neutral and uninvolved with political as well as community and industry missions like this.” I am also in the process of contacting individual retailers with informational slides and a survey for retailers to express their support or concerns about a fur prohibition in town. Understandably, retailers may have concerns about unforeseen “what ifs” of a fur prohibition, even if they don’t sell any fur or sell only a negligible

amount of it in the form of accessories.  But research from consulting firms devoted to brand image and performance show that making a fur-free commitment only helps businesses.

The CEO of the consulting firm The Luxury Institute, which has conducted significant quantitative and qualitative research into consumer habits of affluent and wealthy consumers (such as those likely to shop in Wellesley’s retail stores), has summarized the firm’s findings as follows: “If [fur] is not a necessity, if it doesn’t define a brand’s reason to exist — which it doesn’t for most companies — then they’re probably not selling a lot of it anyway due to consumer and societal sentiment. If you don’t have the moral clarity [not to sell fur], at least have the economic clarity.”

It’s for this reason that nearly all high-end designers and hundreds and hundreds of retailers have already made fur-free commitments. While these brands certainly care about animal welfare, they also understand that ditching fur is good for their brand image and their business. Sticking with fur puts businesses behind the curve on an issue of growing societal concern.

It looks like Fur-Free Wellesley is part of a larger Fur-Free Massachusetts effort. Are there other local communities beyond Wellesley making moves,  or is Wellesley the first?

Wellesley is the first, but certainly not the last. Discussions are underway for similar propositions in other locales, and Fur-Free Massachusetts is organizing for statewide legislation in the 2021-23 legislative season. We already have a dozen state and national animal advocacy organizations supporting the initiative.

I see you got the necessary number of signatures for the petition, but what’s your sense of interest in this subject in town?

The fur industry is an issue that most people are generally unaware of, but they are rightfully appalled when informed: 100,000,000 animals killed annually by the cheapest and therefore cruelest means possible strictly for their pelts, and 85-95% of these animals are raised in tiny cages on fur farms unable ever to participate in any behaviors natural to their species. 80% of the fur we purchase here in the USA comes from China, where there are no regulations for animal welfare. As such, this is where the worst abuses occur, including the live skinning of animals, which has been regularly documented.

When handing out flyers to community members in December outside the Special Town Meeting, it was illuminating to hear numerous women tell me that they only shop at certain chain stores (beyond Wellesley) for their accessories because they know the fur is fake. It was also telling to see a few people in fur-lined Canada Goose parkas (which is not a brand sold in Wellesley) who were genuinely supportive of the measure. This really goes to show that many buying fur are not doing so because they are actively seeking it out, but because the relationship between personal consumer choices and the cruelties of the fur industry often isn’t in the forefront of people’s minds.

If Wellesley is representative of larger state trends, there is broad support for this measure when informed about the issues that motivate it.  The Humane Society Legislative Fund and Fur-Free Alliance have each conducted polls, which demonstrate that 59-64% of Massachusetts voters support a statewide fur ban, with only 19% opposing. 

Furthermore, this citizens’ petition is supported by three well-respected national and state organizations known for legislating animal welfare issues that are supported by the broad public: the Humane Society of the United States, the MSPCA, and the Animal Legal Defense Fund. Their support is really a testament to how mainstream the fur-free movement has become, such that effective legislation is now possible.

Anything else worth adding?

It’s also important to point out the extremely adverse environmental impact of fur, especially in light of Wellesley’s commitment to sustainability on so many fronts.  It is a common misconception that fur is an eco-friendly and sustainable material. This is a marketing point propagated entirely by the fur industry itself, which EU regulatory agencies have deemed false and misleading advertising. Several studies by the environmental sustainability group CE Delft demonstrate why. 

These studies found that fur is the worst offending textile—synthetic or natural—in 17 of the 18 environmental categories considered. The studies also found that the climate change impact of mink fur is five times higher than the second worst offending textile, wool (sheep being high methane producers requiring lots of land and feed), and six times higher than a faux-fur alternative. This is largely due to the feed, land use, toxicity, and manure of the fur industry. For example, producing 1 kg of mink fur requires 11.4 minks and 563 kg of feed comprised of mostly chicken and fish. This highly inefficient production taxes land and water resources, and causes significant waste runoff that is consistently reported to pollute local water supplies. 

I’m not advocating that we should all go out and buy faux-fur, as we don’t need more plastic in this world either. The choice between one or the other is a false binary also propagated by the fur industry. But the fact of the matter is that faux-fur alternatives, which are already better environmentally than real fur, are only going to continue to improve in terms of sustainability. In fact, the faux fur in designer Stella McCartney’s recent line is made entirely from recycled plastics and corn. Real fur production and its environmental impact, however, is not going to change. So if you really feel the need to have the aesthetic of fur in your wardrobe, faux-fur is the far better choice, both for the animals and the environment.

Fur Free Wellesley — Fur Free Massachusetts(1)

Bold Red LinkedIn Post Header (1)

print

Share

Filed Under: Animals, Business, Government

Comments

  1. Maureen Warren says

    January 25, 2020 at 12:45 pm

    This seems like an obvious win for the planet and animal rights with no real economic cost to businesses. And even if there were some costs, this is too important to count pennies. Wellesley should been fur ASAP.

    Reply
  2. Owen Cornwall says

    January 25, 2020 at 1:09 pm

    I think the fur ban is a good idea.

    Reply
  3. JOSHUA RESNICK says

    January 26, 2020 at 3:12 pm

    What an obvious thing to do. Good for the environment. Good for animals. No economic costs. No impact on convenience, style, comfort. Amazing this didn’t occur years ago. Bravo to Wellesley (hopefully) for being the first town in the state to enact such an obvious measure.

    Reply
  4. Robert Soderholm says

    January 27, 2020 at 12:28 pm

    If the town wants to get into the business of banning things that are ethically or morally objectionable, why not ban the sale of huge, fuel guzzling SUVs? Scientists keep assuring us that we are on the verge of a cataclysmic climate catastrophe. Such a ban would probably do more to benefit quality of life in the town, reducing air pollution and reducing the accident risk these huge behemoths pose to smaller cars. We would also be making a clear statement that we are all responsible for climate crisis unless we change our buying habits.

    Reply
  5. Larisa Romanova says

    January 29, 2020 at 11:39 am

    Good job, Wellesley residents! I only hope that the next step will be the Fur sale ban in the state of MA. Perhaps, wearing natural Fur was a necessity in the past, these days it is merely a senseless atrocity towards the animals.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You have to agree to the comment policy.

Linden Square, Wellesley
Deland, Gibson, Wellesley
Wonderful Wellesley, see what's new

Tip us off…

Please send tips, photos, ideas to [email protected]

 

Advertisements

Wellesley Square
Wellesley, Jesamondo
Edge on Science
Sexton test prep
Feldman Law
Fay School, Southborough
Wellesley Theatre Project
Volvo
Cheesy Street Grill
Admit Fit, Wellesley
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Twitter
Never miss a post with our free daily Swellesley Report email
Name: 
Your email address:*
Please wait...
Please enter all required fields Click to hide
Correct invalid entries Click to hide

You can subscribe for free, though we appreciate any contribution that supports our independent journalism.

Click on Entering Natick sign to read our Natick Report

Entering Natick road sign

Most Read Posts

  • Family withdraws plan for large house near Wellesley's Brook Path
  • One final Hunnewell clap-out & shouts of "Judie! Judie! Judie!" for beloved crossing guard
  • Wellesley overwhelmed by Westwood in state final for girls' lacrosse
  • Wellesley school news: Wellesley High grads return to Hardy; German students feast; Get your kids into consulting
  • Bench near Wellesley High honors Tom Zinck

Upcoming Events

Jun 28
6:00 pm - 7:00 pm

Fay School admission information session

Jul 6
10:00 am - 11:00 am

Open House at Boston Outdoor Preschool Network

Jul 16
10:00 am - 4:00 pm

Wellesley Square July Jubilation Sidewalk Sale

Jul 19
8:00 am - 9:00 am

Fay School admission information session

Jul 20
10:00 am - 11:00 am

Tour at Boston Outdoor Preschool Network

View Calendar

Popular pages

  • Wellesley’s 7 official scenic roads

Recent Comments

  • Susan on Wellesley Business Buzz: Merchants raise ‘Parking, parking, parking’ concerns in Wellesley Square; Lockheart Restaurant sign goes up
  • Susan Glynn on Wellesley Business Buzz: Merchants raise ‘Parking, parking, parking’ concerns in Wellesley Square; Lockheart Restaurant sign goes up
  • Jerry on Wellesley Business Buzz: Merchants raise ‘Parking, parking, parking’ concerns in Wellesley Square; Lockheart Restaurant sign goes up
  • EK on Family withdraws plan for large house near Wellesley’s Brook Path
  • Amy G. on Big Wellesley garage sale, June 18th, plus Town rules for holding your own sale

Links we like

  • Great Runs
  • Jack Sanford: Wellesley's Major League Baseball Star
  • Taquitos.net
  • Tech-Tamer
  • The Wellesley Wine Press
  • Universal Hub
  • Wellesley Sports Discussion Facebook Group

Categories

  • 2021 Town Election (24)
  • Animals (416)
  • Antiques (49)
  • Art (576)
  • Beyond Wellesley (47)
  • Books (365)
  • Business (1,500)
  • Camp (11)
  • Careers/jobs (48)
  • Churches (79)
  • Clubs (228)
  • Construction (295)
  • Dump (127)
  • Education (3,108)
    • Babson College (250)
    • Bates Elementary School (16)
    • Dana Hall School (34)
    • Fiske Elementary School (9)
    • Hardy Elementary School (44)
    • Hunnewell Elementary School (42)
    • MassBay (55)
    • Schofield Elementary School (24)
    • Sprague Elementary School (19)
    • St. John School (2)
    • Tenacre Country Day School (11)
    • Upham Elementary School (35)
    • Wellesley College (608)
    • Wellesley High School (961)
    • Wellesley Middle School (203)
  • Embracing diversity (69)
  • Entertainment (786)
  • Environment (748)
  • Fashion (141)
  • Finance (14)
  • Fire (161)
  • Food (342)
  • Fundraising (612)
  • Gardens (157)
  • Government (555)
    • 2020 Town Election (47)
    • 2022 Town Election (14)
  • Health (850)
    • COVID-19 (200)
  • Hikes (3)
  • History (388)
  • Holidays (405)
  • Houses (153)
  • Humor (47)
  • Kids (849)
  • Law (8)
  • Legal notices (6)
  • Letters to the Editor (62)
  • Media (70)
  • METCO (4)
  • Military (11)
  • Morses Pond (108)
  • Music (568)
  • Natick Report (29)
  • Neighbors (273)
  • Obituaries & remembrances (73)
  • Outdoors (642)
  • Parenting (62)
  • Police (757)
    • Crime (386)
  • Politics (551)
  • POPS Senior Profile (8)
  • RDF (6)
  • Real estate (330)
  • Religion (131)
  • Restaurants (332)
  • Safety (150)
  • Scouts (2)
  • Seniors (120)
  • Shopping (143)
  • Sponsored (6)
  • Sports (980)
    • Athlete of the Week (6)
  • STEM (107)
  • Technology (164)
  • Theatre (392)
  • Town Meeting (23)
  • Transportation (230)
  • Travel (17)
  • Uncategorized (1,230)
  • Volunteering (346)
  • Weather (177)
  • Wellesley Election 2019 (21)
  • Wellesley Free Library (276)
  • Wellesley's Wonderful Weekend (19)
RSS Feed Icon Subscribe to RSS Feed
Deland, Gibson Insurance, Wellesley

© 2022 The Swellesley Report
Site by Tech-Tamer · Login