As if it wasn’t impressive enough that Wellesley’s Andrew Courey published a book called “Early Bird Gets The Bitcoin” as an 11-year-old in 2018, he’s back this year with a second book called “
Courey—19 now, 18 when he wrote the book—attends Tremont School in Concord and not surprisingly has plans to study political science/government in college. He was supported throughout his latest book writing process by his family, including sister Alexa, who did the cover art.
The official description for “How Liberty Lives” explains that it was “ written in defense of civil liberties and in honor of the 250th Anniversary of the Declaration of Independence.” It’s a narrated collection of 250 new and old quotes about civil liberties and democracy.
After reading the book’s intro, I shot Courey a handful of questions by email. Here’s our exchange:
What prompted you to write this?
I have spent a lot of time on my own studying power and law. An area of particular interest to me is authoritarian regimes and how they operate. An important question for me is why are places oppressive. What I found was that in democracies it wasn’t because constitutions weren’t good enough or that a corrupt elite was keeping power through violence, it was because the people wanted what they wanted more than freedom. No amount of laws, norms, or Constitutional rights can make a free country out of a people that do not believe in liberty. Senator Padmé Amidala’s quote in Star Wars: Revenge of the Sith, “So this is how liberty dies. With thunderous applause,” describes my view. I wrote “How Liberty Lives” because I believe that if liberty can die by thunderous applause it can live by it too. Through educating the people about the importance of liberty generally and of the specific elements that is requires (freedom of the press, freedom of expression, freedom of religion, an independent judiciary, separation of powers and checks and balances, limited government, and many more) I believe I can spread my love of freedom and teach the rulers of our republic (the people) how to keep and expand it.
How did your ideas for the book evolve?
My initial idea for the book was 1776 quotes on freedom in the mid fall, that became 250 quotes for the 250th Anniversary of the United States. Eventually the book expanded to include narration on the quotes, then chapter essays, a Recipe for Liberty, and a very lengthy introduction about vague laws, an overly harsh criminal justice system, low civic education, and mass surveillance. Separately I wanted to write a book on vague laws, but quickly realized I lacked the legal expertise and time to do so. I then separately drafted some proposed constitutional amendments instead to send to the government. Near the end of writing my book I combined these to create my list of proposed Constitutional Amendments in an open letter to state legislatures.
Is the premise here that we’ve been making decent progress on civil liberties over the past 250 years, but that a confluence of things now could threaten that progress?
I truly believe our country will be free in the future. From the birth of our nation until now, we have seen Thomas Jefferson and James Madison’s dream of freedom be transformed into reality. The spirit of the Founding Fathers was right, but it has taken the whole of our history for it to come close to being realized. What concerns me today is that most people have no memory of the time in our history when the freedoms we take for granted today (voting rights, anti-discrimination laws, freedom of speech, privacy rights, and so many more) were far weaker. Every loss of freedom comes with some expected gain in security, wealth, justice, or other positive things. When the people forget the danger and immense harm that comes at the cost of authoritarian policies, it becomes far easier for those who wish to increase their power at the expense of our freedom to do so.
Tech-enabled mass surveillance: Are we mainly talking about artificial general intelligence here, or something broader?
Surveillance has always existed. In Ancient Times, government informants with no technology were capable of monitoring and reporting on dissent. But without any technology however, they could not truly keep an eye on everyone. Since digital recording technology became available, governments gained the capacity to monitor everything. But without incredible numbers of people to listen to and interpret the data, governments can’t actually surveil everything. Only now, with AI can every call be listened to, interpreted, cross analyzed with other surveillance data from billions of people, and relayed to enforcers with near real time and a very low cost. AI still isn’t that smart, so humans are still very needed for these programs. When AI becomes as capable as humans and compute power becomes cheaper with quantum computers, the dream of all autocrats since the beginning of time to monitor and punish all dissent will be possible.
I’m not sure most people think much about the vagueness of our laws. What are the chief threats here to different classes of people?
Vague laws violate the fundamental principle of justice that no person should be punished without having fair notice of what is subject to punishment. Laws are so unclear that even Supreme Court justices who are highly educated lawyers with years of experience can’t even agree on